KnoWhy #735 | June 11, 2024
Why Is Alma the Younger’s Unique Voice Important?
Post contributed by
Scripture Central

“Behold my beloved brethren, seeing that I have been permitted to come unto you, therefore I attempt to address you in my language; yea, by my own mouth.” Alma 7:1
The Know
The Book of Mormon was primarily compiled by Mormon, but it also includes the voices of 148 other authors and quoted individuals, like Nephi and Alma the Younger.1 Alma’s is the third-most-heard voice in the Book of Mormon, after Mormon’s and Nephi’s, with 20,051 words and 7.5 percent of the total text.2 Alma’s words are preserved as direct quotations by Mormon, primarily in sermons and in blessings or counsel to Alma’s sons.3 Alma’s unique language conveys important doctrines and personal testimonies.
Various stylometric studies have confirmed that, indeed, Alma’s voice has a style distinctive from those of the many other ancient individuals who contributed to the Book of Mormon.4 Thus, a study of Alma’s voice can teach readers more about Alma himself and unfold the rich verbal background that stands behind his profound teachings.5 As John Hilton III noted, “ultimately, the power of identifying [a prophet’s] distinctive voice” is found in the verbal “portrait of [each] faithful prophet.”6
Alma’s tendency to use seemingly insignificant words can highlight his unique speaking patterns.7 Alma uses yea and now a disproportionate amount compared to other voices. He proportionally uses now more than any other Book of Mormon voice (using it over three times more than Lehi, Nephi, and Moroni), and he also uses yea more than all except three of the minor voices.8 Alma often uses now in conjunction with application questions to prompt his listeners to ponder and personally answer each question right away, as Alma clearly knew the importance of timely action. Though Alma’s emphatic use of yea and now may be specifically tailored to sermons, the occurrence of these words in Alma’s sermons is disproportionately higher than in any other sermons in the Book of Mormon, “making it extremely unlikely that Alma’s frequent use of these words occur by chance.”9
Alma also uses many words and phrases of theological significance that teach us even more about him. Such topical words and phrases are more subject to circumstance and are less crucial for identifying a unique speaking pattern; nonetheless, they reveal the thoughts and values of an individual. Omission can be instructive as well. Alma uses the word “covenant” only once (in Alma 7:15), although it is used more than one hundred and fifty times by numerous others in the Book of Mormon.10 Perhaps this was because most people in Alma’s audiences were already under covenant. What they needed, as Alma knew well, was to repent, and so he used the words repent or repentance about fifty times.
Some of Alma’s significant words include state (which he used twenty-four times), soul (sixty times), plan (twenty times), and resurrection (thirty-four times), often in the context of teachings about the afterlife.11 Alma also uses at least twenty different names or titles for Jesus Christ, three of which are uniquely found in his writings or speeches in the Book of Mormon.12
Alma uses soul more frequently and more total times than any other speaker, appearing in every major message but especially Alma 40. He uses it somewhat uniquely; five other Book of Mormon authors speak of the welfare of souls, and Nephi frequently speaks of his soul delighting, but Alma never does. Rather, Alma uniquely speaks of souls as either being racked with torment or comforted. Alma frequently uses soul in connection with physical bodies, resurrection, and the afterlife.13 In passages discussing the resurrection, Alma favors soul while Jacob uses spirit, showing a distinct preference.
Alma uses resurrection thirty-four times, more than any other Book of Mormon author, and thirty of those are written to Corianton. Only Abinadi uses resurrection proportionally more but Hilton suggests that Abinadi’s frequent use of resurrection may have been passed to Alma the Younger through Alma the Elder.14 Though limited samples are often misrepresentative, we know that Alma himself had undergone a near-death experience and had pondered deeply about the Resurrection. Having received revelation about the reality of life after mortality, Alma could tell Corianton about it without hesitation: “But I show unto you one thing which I have inquired diligently of God that I might know—that is concerning the resurrection” (Alma 40:3).
Alma uses plan in terms of God’s plan more than anyone else in the Book of Mormon. Only Amulek, his convert and preaching companion, uses it proportionally more.15 Amulek uses five of the nine Book of Mormon terms for God’s plan, though Alma coins three unique descriptors when instructing Corianton: plan of restoration, plan of happiness, and plan of mercy.16 Alma’s strident teachings about the Final Judgment and the suffering of Christ may have seemed especially severe to his Nehorite contemporaries, who believed in unconditional salvation, no absolute morality, and no afterlife.17 However, Alma emphasized what God’s plan was really about with the words he used to describe the plan: mercy, happiness, restoration, salvation, and redemption.
Philip Allred notes that Alma uses the word state to reword other concepts, especially when discussing the abstract conditions of the afterlife. However, Alma also uses the word more than other Book of Mormon authors when discussing the concept of agency, suggesting that his usage is unique.18
Alma employs considerable skill in speaking, using several rhetorical strategies. Perhaps because so much of his material was delivered in speeches, Alma asks more rhetorical questions in total than the other authors and is second proportionally only to Abinadi.19 Alma asks 102 questions, primarily in Alma 5, and most often uses the phrases believest thou and can ye to ask pointed application questions.20
Alma was a well-informed leader, and his teachings hint at an awareness of Israelite culture, festivals, temple worship, and law—something his technical vocabulary corroborates.21 Of particular note is Alma’s use of chiasmus in Alma 36, Alma 41, and elsewhere. This literary device was commonly used in Hebrew literary composition and uses symmetrical structures to emphasize similarities, contrasts, or consequential turning points.22 Scholars have also argued that Alma’s writings show an attunement to Mesoamerican religious traditions and imagery as well as a sensitivity to the divided Nephite culture itself.23 He was an effective spiritual shepherd—in fact, Shepherd is a title for Christ used particularly by Alma, the high priest, seven times.24
Alma’s writings clearly seem to have been influenced by earlier Book of Mormon authors. As the main Nephite recordkeeper, Alma seems to quote or paraphrase Lehi, Benjamin, the angel who corrected him, and others, most especially Abinadi.25 His teachings also had a powerful influence on his own and later generations, and phrases he said were adopted by both Ammon (Alma’s close friend in the land of Zarahemla) and Samuel the Lamanite (a later prophet who spoke from the walls of Zarahemla).26 Mormon’s inclusion of so many of Alma’s teachings attests not only the spiritual power of Alma’s messages but also the extent of Alma’s “dutiful and detailed recordkeeping.”27
The Why
Alma’s unique voice was shaped by the prophet’s turbulent personal past and his surprising redemption. He was said to be “a man of many words” before his conversion, a skill which he used initially for flattery but later for teaching the people (Mosiah 27:8, 32). His cultural awareness and skillful rhetoric, once used to destroy the church of God, were then used to build it up.
Alma’s past also helps explain some of his frequently repeated phrases and topics. Like the Apostle John, Alma makes particular mention of the importance of being born again through God.28 Alma teaches that being born again is an essential spiritual process in preparing for the afterlife.
Another of Alma’s specific themes is remembering ancestral and personal captivity of the past, something that an angel exhorted Alma to do:
Go, and remember the captivity of thy fathers in the land of Helam, and in the land of Nephi; and remember how great things he has done for them; for they were in bondage, and he has delivered them.29
Alma reiterates this advice repeatedly throughout his ministry while affirming that he has taken it to heart:
Then do I remember what the Lord has done for me, yea, even that he hath heard my prayer; yea, then do I remember his merciful arm which he extended towards me. Yea, and I also remember the captivity of my fathers; for I surely do know that the Lord did deliver them out of bondage, and by this did establish his church.30
It can certainly be unpleasant to remember past trials we or our ancestors endured, whether because of sins or outside circumstances. However, a healthy level of remembrance fills individuals with gratitude for deliverance and prevents us from falling into similar errors. Moroni suggests that remembering God’s mercy in the past is part of receiving a divine witness of the Book of Mormon’s truth:
Behold, I would exhort you that when ye shall read these things, if it be wisdom in God that ye should read them, that ye would remember how merciful the Lord hath been unto the children of men, from the creation of Adam even down until the time that ye shall receive these things, and ponder it in your hearts.31
On a personal level, scripture exhorts all to balance a memory of our mistakes with an optimistic focus on the future. Peter suggests that we often err because we forget that we were “purged from [our] old sins,” but Paul also recommends “forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before” (2 Peter 1:9; Philippians 3:13). Readers can take comfort in Alma’s being forgiven and in the mercies exhibited in their own lives. This can then allow sublime gratitude to fuel them as it did Alma.32
John Hilton III, Voices in the Book of Mormon: Discovering Distinctive Witnesses of Jesus Christ (Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2024), 41–62, 171–203.
Book of Mormon Central, “Why Is Jacob’s Distinctive Voice Significant? (Jacob 1:17),” KnoWhy 725 (April 2, 2024).
Evidence Central, “Book of Mormon Evidence: Stylometry,” Evidence #0272, November 22, 2021.
- 1. John Hilton III, Voices in the Book of Mormon: Discovering Distinctive Witnesses of Jesus Christ (Salt Lake City, UT: Deseret Book; Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, Religious Studies Center, 2024), 14.
- 2. This holds true only if Jesus Christ and the Lord are considered separate speakers. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 14.
- 3. For a list of Alma’s speeches and audiences, see John W. Welch and Greg Welch, “The Speeches of Alma,” in Charting the Book of Mormon (Provo, UT: FARMS, 1999), chart 60.
- 4. For a review of stylometric studies of the Book of Mormon, see Evidence Central, “Book of Mormon Evidence: Stylometry,” Evidence #0272 (November 22, 2021); Book of Mormon Central, “What Can Stylometry Tell Us about Book of Mormon Authorship? (Jacob 4:4),” KnoWhy 389 (December 12, 2017); Book of Mormon Central, “Is It Possible That a Single Author Wrote the Book of Mormon? (2 Nephi 27:13),” KnoWhy 399 (January 16, 2018).
- 5. For another example, see Book of Mormon Central, “Why Is Jacob’s Distinctive Voice Significant? (Jacob 1:17),” KnoWhy 725 (April 2, 2024).
- 6. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 40.
- 7. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 43–46.
- 8. Hilton refers to the primary fifteen speakers, each one representing at least 1 percent of Book of Mormon words, as major speakers. The other 134 speakers are the minor speakers, and their word patterns are difficult to confidently analyze due to the small sample size. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 14.
- 9. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 44n3.
- 10. Welch and Welch, “Citations of the Word ‘Covenant’ in the Book of Mormon,” Charting the Book of Mormon, chart 57.
- 11. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 46–56.
- 12. The titles are “a Son of God” (Alma 36:17), “Christ Jesus” (Alma 5:44), and “Good Shepherd” (used seven times).
- 13. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 47–51. Though Doctrine and Covenants 88:15 says, “The spirit and the body are the soul of man,” Alma and other Book of Mormon authors clearly use it interchangeably with spirit as in Alma 40:23.
- 14. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 54–56.
- 15. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 51–54.
- 16. Book of Mormon Central, “Why Are There So Many Different Names for the Plan of Salvation? (Alma 42:5, 8, 13, 15),” KnoWhy 312 (May 12, 2017); Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 52–53.
- 17. Mosiah 26:2; Alma 1:4; 30:17–18; 41:1, 10.
- 18. Philip Allred, “Alma’s Use of State in the Book of Mormon: Evidence of Multiple Authorship,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 5, no. 1 (1996): 140–146; Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 46–47.
- 19. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 58–62.
- 20. Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Ask Church Members Fifty Probing Questions? (Alma 5:14–15),” KnoWhy 112 (June 1, 2016).
- 21. Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Repeat the Lord’s Name Ten Times While in Prayer? (Alma 31:26),” KnoWhy 139 (July 8, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Wish to Speak ‘with the Trump of God’? (Alma 29:1),” KnoWhy 136 (July 5, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Teach His Opponents about the Temple? (Alma 12:30),” KnoWhy 119 (June 10, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Bless and Thank God After Eating? (Alma 8:22),” KnoWhy 115 (June 6, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “Did Alma Counsel His Sons during the Passover? (Alma 38:5),” KnoWhy 146 (July 19, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Was the City of Ammonihah Destroyed and Left Desolate? (Alma 16:9–11),” KnoWhy 123 (June 16, 2016).
- 22. Noel B. Reynolds, “Rethinking Alma 36,” Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 34 (2020): 279–312; Welch and Welch, “Chiasmus in Alma 36,” in Charting the Book of Mormon, chart 132; Book of Mormon Central, “Why Was Alma Converted? (Alma 36:21),” KnoWhy 144 (July 15, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “Was Chiasmus Known to Ancient American Writers? (Alma 29:4),” KnoWhy 346 (July 31, 2017); Book of Mormon Central, “How Can Contrasts Teach Us about True Conversion? (Mosiah 27:25),” KnoWhy 562 (May 19, 2020).
- 23. Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Face Such Great Political Challenges as the Chief Judge? (Alma 2:1–5),” KnoWhy 563 (May 26, 2020); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Respond in the Way He Did to the ‘Order of Nehor’ in Ammonihah? (Alma 13:7),” KnoWhy 566 (June 16, 2020); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Talk about Planting a Seed in the Heart? (Alma 33:23),” KnoWhy 569 (July 14, 2020); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Ask about Having God’s Image Engraven upon One’s Countenance? (Alma 5:19),” KnoWhy 295 (April 3, 2017); Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Talk about Melchizedek? (Alma 13:14),” KnoWhy 120 (June 13, 2016).
- 24. The use of the term seven times, all in one sermon (Alma 7), may have had religious significance. Welch and Welch, “Names Used for Christ by Major Book of Mormon Authors,” in Charting the Book of Mormon, chart 44; Welch and Welch, “Names and Concepts Associated with Christ by Major Book of Mormon Authors,” in Charting the Book of Mormon, chart 45.
- 25. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 115–117, 119, 153–157, 171–203; Book of Mormon Central, “Why Did Alma Draw on the Teachings of Abinadi? (Alma 40:16),” KnoWhy 571 (July 28, 2020); Book of Mormon Central, “How Did Later Prophets Utilize the Teachings of King Benjamin? (Helaman 5:9),” KnoWhy 728 (April 23, 2024); Matthew Scott Stenson, “‘According to the Spirit of Revelation and Prophecy’: Alma’s Prophetic Warning of Christ’s Coming to the Lehites (and Others),” Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 55 (2023):128–137.
- 26. Hilton notes that the similar language of Alma and Ammon could be from Mormon’s editing. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 124–125, 211–215.
- 27. Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 60.
- 28. Mosiah 27:24; Alma 5:14, 49; 7:14; compare John 3:3; 1 John 2:29; 3:9; 4:7; 5:18. See Book of Mormon Central, “What Does It Mean to Be “Born Again?” (Mosiah 27:25),” KnoWhy 501 (February 7, 2019); S. Kent Brown, “Alma’s Conversion: Reminiscences in His Sermons,” in The Book of Mormon: Alma, The Testimony of the Word, ed. Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate Jr. (Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1992), 141–156.
- 29. Mosiah 27:16; Hilton, Voices in the Book of Mormon, 56–58.
- 30. Alma 29:10–11; see Alma 5: 5–6; 29: 10–12; 36:2, 29; Book of Mormon Central, “What the Exodus Teaches Us about the Atonement (Alma 36:28),” KnoWhy 419 (March 27, 2018).
- 31. Moroni 10:3; Book of Mormon Central, “How Will God Manifest the Truth of the Book of Mormon? (Moroni 10:4),” KnoWhy 254 (December 16, 2016); Book of Mormon Central, “How Important Was It to Moroni that We Pray about the Book of Mormon? (Moroni 10:4–5),” KnoWhy 359 (August 30, 2017).
- 32. Kylie Nielson Turley, Alma 1–29: A Brief Theological Introduction (Provo, UT: Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, 2020), 20: “Is it insensitive or destructive to try to understand pre-conversion Alma? It can be. However, the same search can also be wise and even kind. … Discerning Alma’s wickedness is also the empathetic basis for discerning the pain behind his interactions, motivations, and relationships. While the approach could be used to vilify a beloved scripture figure, understanding Alma’s very wicked beliefs and practices makes him more realistic, his repentance more miraculous, and his redemption more hopeful.”