Evidence #374 | October 10, 2022

Book of Mormon Evidence: King Benjamin’s Literary Influence

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

Abstract

On scores of occasions, words and phrases found in King Benjamin’s speech appear to be quoted, paraphrased, or alluded to in later Nephite texts. The extensive influence of his sayings on the Nephite textual record is both historically realistic and literarily complex.

By almost any measure, King Benjamin’s speech, found in the opening chapters of the book of Mosiah, constitutes a remarkable literary achievement. “Unparalleled in many respects by anything else in the Book of Mormon,” writes John W. Welch, “this document stands as a monument of Nephite civilization and spirituality. … Because of the wide influence he had on his own subjects and subsequent generations in the Book of Mormon, Benjamin occupied a unique place in Nephite history.”1 One way that Benjamin’s influence can be demonstrated is the extent to which subsequent authors quoted, paraphrased, or otherwise drew upon the language and themes from his final recorded words to his family and people.

Long Quotations

On several occasions, later authors replicated some of Benjamin’s lengthier statements, sometimes with perfect or near-perfect precision.2 One striking example comes from Samuel the Lamanite, who spoke of “Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Father of heaven and of earth, the Creator of all things from the beginning” (Helaman 14:12). This 21-word name title happens to be a verbatim quote from Mosiah 3:8:3

Mosiah 3

Helaman 14

And he shall be called Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Father of heaven and earth, the Creator of all things from the beginning; and his mother shall be called Mary (Mosiah 3:8)

And also that ye might know of the coming of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Father of heaven and of earth, the Creator of all things from the beginning; and that ye might know of the signs of his coming, to the intent that ye might believe on his name (Helaman 14:12)

Paraphrases

Most examples of textual dependency, however, aren’t quite so precise. In many instances, Benjamin’s words were only paraphrased by subsequent authors. This type of relationship can be seen in Mormon’s comment that at the judgment day the righteous would “sing ceaseless praises with the choirs above” (Mormon 7:7). While this description appears to draw on Benjamin’s wording in Mosiah 2:28, it isn’t an exact match. This is demonstrated in the chart below, where distinct phrasal elements have been color-coded for easier identification.

Mosiah 2

Mormon 7

that I might go down in peace, and my immortal spirit may join the choirs above in singing the praises of a just God (Mosiah 2:28)

whereby he that is found guiltless before him at the judgment day hath it given unto him to dwell in the presence of God in his kingdom, to sing ceaseless praises with the choirs above, unto the Father, and unto the Son, and unto the Holy Ghost, which are one God (Mormon 7:7)

Despite the lack of precision, enough similarity exists to suspect Mormon was drawing his wording from Benjamin’s speech. Most importantly, both passages utilize the distinct phrase “choirs above” which is found nowhere else in the standard works.4 The way this phrase is accompanied in each case by the idea of “sing[ing] … praises” to God helps solidify the connection (even though Mormon adds the term “ceaseless” and gives a different description of God’s attributes).

Short Quotations

Other candidates for textual influence can be seen in distinctive shorter statements which first show up in Benjamin’s speech and then are reused by subsequent Nephite authors.5 Near the end of his book, Moroni stated that “we have a labor to perform whilst in this tabernacle of clay” (Moroni 9:6). The only other place where the phrase “tabernacle of clay” shows up in the standard works is near the middle of Benjamin’s speech: “the Lord Omnipotent … shall come down from heaven among the children of men, and shall dwell in a tabernacle of clay” (Mosiah 3:5). While certainly unique, the phrase is only three words in length, making it less clear, at least when viewed in isolation, whether it is a true quotation or just an instance of both writers utilizing a stock phrase, perhaps from some unknown source.

Clustering

One thing that the above-mentioned example (“tabernacle of clay”) has going in its favor is that another distinctive phrase from Benjamin’s speech (“enemy of all righteousness”) turns up immediately afterward in Moroni 9:6.6 In addition, Moroni throws the word “labor” into the mix, a key idea discussed in Mosiah 2:14 and Mosiah 2:18. Thus, we have two phrases and a major theme from Benjamin’s speech concentrated together in a single passage in Moroni 9:

Mosiah 2–4

Moroni 9

And even I, myself, have labored with mine own hands that I might serve you (Mosiah 2:14)

if I, whom ye call your king, do labor to serve you, then ought not ye to labor to serve one another? (Mosiah 2:18)

therefore he listeth to obey the evil spirit, and becometh an enemy to all righteousness (Mosiah 2:37)

the Lord Omnipotent … shall come down from heaven among the children of men, and shall dwell in a tabernacle of clay, and shall go forth amongst men (Mosiah 3:5)

and serve the devil, who is the master of sin, or who is the evil spirit which hath been spoken of by our fathers, he being an enemy to all righteousness (Mosiah 4:14)

for we have a labor to perform whilst in this tabernacle of clay, that we may conquer the enemy of all righteousness, and rest our souls in the kingdom of God (Moroni 9:6)

Clustering can involve various combinations of quotes, paraphrases, and key words or ideas. While some examples are ultimately more persuasive than others, the close proximity of multiple, textually similar elements increases the likelihood that they collectively derive from or allude to Benjamin’s writings. Here is an example of an especially strong clustering of ideas in Helaman 4:24–25, involving four lengthy phrases derived from two different locations in Benjamin’s speech:7

Mosiah 1–2

Helaman 4

the Lord will deliver them up, that thereby they become weak like unto their brethren; and he will no more preserve them by his matchless and marvelous power, as he has hitherto preserved our fathers (Mosiah 1:12–13)

therefore, the Lord has no place in him, for he dwelleth not in unholy temples (Mosiah 2:37)

And they saw that they had become weak, like unto their brethren, the Lamanites, and that the Spirit of the Lord did no more preserve them; yea, it had withdrawn from them because the Spirit of the Lord doth not dwell in unholy temples—Therefore the Lord did cease to preserve them by his miraculous and matchless power, for they had fallen into a state of unbelief and awful wickedness (Helaman 4:24–25)

Clustering in Textual Units

One can also find what might be termed clusters of clusters in larger textual units. One impressive example can be seen in Alma’s instructions to Helaman in Alma 37, which draw extensively from Benjamin’s private counsel to his sons in Mosiah 1. Both units emphasize the importance of the sacred records that had been handed down through the generations. They also include a discussion of the Liahona and the way that it guided their forefathers through the wilderness. These and other clusters of related content are presented in the chart below (even more are included in Appendix 1):

Topic

Mosiah 1

Alma 37

Were It Not for These Records

were it not for these plates, which contain these records and these commandments, we must have suffered in ignorance (Mosiah 1:3)

I say unto you, my sons, were it not for these things, which have been kept and preserved by the hand of God (Mosiah 1:5)

And now, it has hitherto been wisdom in God that these things should be preserved; … Yea, I say unto you, were it not for these things that these records do contain, which are on these plates (Alma 37:8–9)

Plates Enlarge Memory

For it were not possible that our father, Lehi, could have remembered all these things, to have taught them to his children, except it were for the help of these plates (Mosiah 1:4)

for behold, [the plates of brass] have enlarged the memory of this people (Alma 37:8)

Kept and Preserved

were it not for these things, which have been kept and preserved by the hand of God, that we might read and understand of his mysteries (Mosiah 1:5)

they should be … kept and preserved by the hand of the Lord until … they shall know of the mysteries contained thereon (Alma 37:4)

Ball or Director

and the ball or director, which led our fathers through the wilderness, which was prepared by the hand of the Lord that thereby they might be led (Mosiah 1:16)

I have somewhat to say concerning the thing which our fathers call a ball, or director—or our fathers called it Liahona, which is, being interpreted, a compass; and the Lord prepared it. … And behold, it was prepared to show unto our fathers the course which they should travel in the wilderness (Alma 37:38–39)

Heed and Diligence

which led … every one according to the heed and diligence which they gave unto him. Therefore, as they were unfaithful they did not prosper nor progress in their journey, but were driven back, and incurred the displeasure of God upon them; and therefore they were smitten with famine and sore afflictions, to stir them up in remembrance of their duty (Mosiah 1:16–17)

They were slothful, and forgot to exercise their faith and diligence and then those marvelous works ceased, and they did not progress in their journey; Therefore, they tarried in the wilderness, or did not travel a direct course, and were afflicted with hunger and thirst, … for as our fathers were slothful to give heed to this compass … they did not prosper (Alma 37:41–43)

Conclusion

Altogether, later Nephite texts appear to manifest some type of textual relationship with specific words, phrases, or ideas from King Benjamin’s speech on more than 150 occasions.8 Importantly, most of these involve multi-element clusters of words and phrases which, in each case, are only counted as a single intertextual relationship. A comprehensive chart demonstrating the impressive extent of this literary borrowing can be found in Appendix 1. A second chart, showing intertextual clustering in a number of larger literary units, can be found in Appendix 2.9 

If King Benjamin’s speech is really what the text claims, the frequent use of his sayings by later Nephite writers is understandable and even somewhat expected. Benjamin was a pivotal leader, and it would be natural for subsequent Nephite authors to have been intimately familiar with his famous final address.

King Benjamin Talking With His Family. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org. 

More difficult to explain is how all of these textual relationships were produced by Joseph Smith himself, under the theory that he merely fabricated the Book of Mormon. Not only would he have needed to craft the impressive speech itself, but he would have needed to be so familiar with its contents that he could weave intricate combinations of its words and phrases into later writings. Not just once or twice, but many dozens of times over.

This already formidable task seems even less likely to have been achieved when considering Joseph Smith’s limited education, his lack of literary experience, the rapid pace of the translation, the fact that he reportedly didn’t rely on any notes or outlines while dictating the text, and the absence of any substantive revisions in the earliest Book of Mormon manuscripts.10

In the final analysis, King Benjamin’s extensive and enduring influence on the Nephite textual record provides impressive evidence of the Book of Mormon’s consistency and complexity. It also adds to the historical realism of its underlying religious culture and literary traditions.

Further Reading
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Endnotes
Literary Features
Book of Mormon

© 2024 Scripture Central: A Non-Profit Organization. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-5294264