Evidence #52 | September 19, 2020

Book of Mormon Evidence: Alma’s Consistent Conversion Accounts

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

Abstract

The similarities and dissimilarities in the three accounts of Alma’s conversion are consistent with their having been written by a single individual, but in different settings and at different stages of his life.

Alma's Conversion Accounts

Alma recounts his conversion story three different times in the Book of Mormon (see Mosiah 27:8–37; Alma 36:4–26; 38:6–8). The accounts vary in length and were given in different settings and for different purposes. It should not be surprising, therefore, that each one contains unique details not found in the others. Yet, at the same time, the three versions share many consistent words, phrases, and details. The differences and consistencies in these accounts work together as evidence that they were produced by the same individual in different contexts and stages of his life. 

Alma the Younger surrounded by this family and priests. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org.

Understandable Differences

According to John W. Welch, “there is more emphasis in Mosiah 27:18 and 32 on the involvement of the four sons of Mosiah in the appearance of the angel than in Alma 36; this is understandable since King Mosiah is the one reporting the events in Mosiah 27, whereas Alma is speaking in Alma 36 and 38.”1 Moreover, whereas Alma’s account in Mosiah 27 “bears the literary characteristics of a spontaneous utterance,”2 the versions in Alma 36 and 38 “show signs of thoughtful reflection, of years of thinking about his momentous conversion.”3

Welch noted, 

Alma’s accounts have evolved structurally as well. The abrupt antithetical parallelisms in Mosiah 27:29–30 (“I was X, but now I am Y,” repeated four times) have been rearranged into one masterfully crafted chiastic composition in Alma 36:1–30. … Alma 38 is equally interesting. It presents essentially the first half of the chiasm found in Alma 36, up to the climactic turning point, before shifting into hortatory speech admonishing his second son. Having given the doubled version to his eldest son, Helaman, in Alma 36, Alma evidently felt no need to give the fully repeated structure to Shiblon in Alma 38.4

Alma the Younger speaks to his son Shiblon in the land of Zarahemla. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org.

Consistent Details

Concerning consistencies in the text, Welch explained,

… it is impressive that the specific details in the accounts remain accurately consistent. For example, all five of those present fell to the earth before the angel, but only Alma was told to “arise” (Mosiah 27:12–13; Alma 36:7–8) and to “remember the captivity of thy fathers” (Mosiah 27:16; Alma 36:2, 28–29), precisely the same in both accounts.

Even what superficially appears to be a difference is not. Alma 36:16 states that Alma was racked for three days and three nights. Mosiah 27:23, however, says the priests fasted for two days and two nights. This is because, under Nephite practice, the fast would not have begun until the morning of the next day after the decision to fast (Helaman 9:10).5

Shared Words, Phrases, and Ideas

Finally, the number of shared words and phrases in the three accounts is significant. While much of the language is the same, it is often rearranged in complex ways. For example, the details about the earth shaking under the feet of the sons of Mosiah were not simply copied and pasted into later accounts; rather, they seem to have been taken from different portions of the first account and integrated into the later accounts in new and creative ways. At the same time, sometimes language is shared between the later accounts but can’t be found in the early one. To help readers visualize these complex relationships, a sample of textual similarities is color coded in the following chart:

Mosiah 27

Alma 36

Alma 38

“which caused the earth to shake upon which they stood” (v. 11)

“which shook the earth” (v. 18)

shake the earth and cause it to tremble” (v. 18)

“the whole earth did tremble beneath our feet” (v. 7)

“and it shook the whole earth” (v. 7)

As Welch concluded, “It is apparent that these three accounts all originated from the same man. … The repetitions show that a single person was the author of all three and suggest that Alma had told his story many times and had grown accustomed to using these characteristic words and phrases.”6 For a comprehensive comparison of similar words and phrases, see the Appendix.

Conclusion

In his concluding statements on this topic, Welch observed,

Despite the fact that Mosiah 27 is separated from the accounts in Alma 36 and 38 by the many words, events, sermons, conflicts and distractions reported in the intervening one hundred pages of printed text, these three accounts still profoundly bear the unmistakable imprints of a single distinctive person, who throughout his adult lifetime had lived with, thought about, matured through, and insightfully taught by means of his powerful and beautiful conversion story.7

Further Reading
Appendix
Endnotes
Complexity
Intertextuality (Internal)
Alma's Conversion
Book of Mormon

© 2024 Scripture Central: A Non-Profit Organization. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-5294264