Evidence #241 | September 20, 2021

Book of Mormon Evidence: Multiple Calendar Systems

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

Abstract

The Book of Mormon features multiple calendar systems that occasionally overlap and collectively feature hundreds of time-related references.

Book of Mormon Calendars

The Book of Mormon contains three main calendar systems. The first, established by Nephi and used primarily by subsequent writers of the small plates, marks the passage of time in relation to the year that Lehi left Jerusalem (1 Nephi 2:4). While fewer references are made to this system overall, it contains the longest span of time (more than 600 years). 

Lehi leading his family away from Jerusalem. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org. 

The second system was established when King Mosiah changed the Nephite monarchy into a system of judges, hence its designation as the “reign of the judges” (Mosiah 29:44). This system began in the first year of Alma’s reign as chief judge, which coincides with the opening chapter of the book of Alma (Alma 1:2). While only lasting about 100 years (3 Nephi 2:5), this period of Nephite history is the most thoroughly documented, containing approximately 170 references to specific dates.

Alma, the chief judge, giving a blessing. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org. 

The final calendar marks the passage of time from the year of Christ’s birth, which was made known to Book of Mormon peoples by a heavenly sign, as prophesied of by Samuel the Lamanite (Helaman 14:2–3). The fulfillment of this sign is reported in 3 Nephi 1:15, and in the next chapter Mormon informs readers that “the Nephites began to reckon their time from this period when the sign was given, or from the coming of Christ” (3 Nephi 2:7). This calendar system is used through the rest of Mormon’s abridgment, as well as in Mormon and Moroni’s own final records.

Christmas Nativity Scene by bf87 via Adobe Stock. Derivative work by Book of Mormon Central.

In addition to these primary calendar systems, the Book of Mormon contains a couple other instances of sequential dating. Mormon included a short account given by Zeniff, which records the years of his reign in the lands of Lehi-Nephi and Shilom (Mosiah 9–10). Zeniff’s record contains four references to the passage of time,1 which report either the number of years his people had dwelt in the land or, in one instance, the number of years Zeniff had reigned over his people (which seem to be one and the same).

A second brief sequence of time references is found in Ether 13:18–24, which marks the first, second, third, and fourth years that Ether hid in the cavity of a rock. While other time references are scattered throughout the book of Ether (such as the years of peace during a ruler’s reign or the number of years since a ruler attained a throne), they are typically given in isolation with no way to correlate them.2

Overlapping Calendars

In a couple instances, multiple calendars are used simultaneously. In 3 Nephi 1:1, after noting that “the ninety and first year [of the reign of the judges] had passed away,” Mormon reverted back to the early Nephite calendar, informing readers that this same date marked “six hundred years from the time that Lehi left Jerusalem.” This, of course, was an important date in the Nephite calendar because of the repeated prophecy that Christ would be born in this very year,3 the sign of which is reported as appearing only a few verses later (v. 15). Because the sign occurred in this same year, it also marked the first year of the new Nephite calendar which reckoned time from the sign of Christ’s birth.

In the next chapter, Mormon gave the following chronological report: 

And also an hundred years had passed away since the days of Mosiah, who was king over the people of the Nephites. And six hundred and nine years had passed away since Lehi left Jerusalem. And nine years had passed away from the time when the sign was given, which was spoken of by the prophets, that Christ should come into the world. (3 Nephi 2:5–7)

Importantly, on these occasions where the date for all three calendars is given, the correlation among the respective systems is mathematically accurate.4

Conclusion

Together, throughout its multiple calendar systems, the Book of Mormon features hundreds of sequentially accurate time-related references (see Appendix).5 If the book were a mere work of fiction, it wouldn’t have to be so chronologically complex. It would surely have been much easier for Joseph Smith or any other proposed 19th century author to implement a single calendar system with fewer time-related references. Yet the text features various systems, as might be expected from an authentically ancient civilization that persisted for nearly a thousand years.6

Even near the transition phases from one calendar to another, the narrator never forgets which system of years is being reckoned. And on the two occasions where a date is given for multiple calendars simultaneously, the time correlation among the systems is mathematically accurate.7 The implementation of these separate calendars, with their host of dates and their respective modes of reckoning, is an important component of the Book of Mormon’s complexity. 

Further Reading
Appendix
Endnotes
Complexity
Chronology
Multiple Calendars
Book of Mormon

© 2024 Scripture Central: A Non-Profit Organization. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-5294264