Evidence #552 | July 10, 2026

Book of Moses Evidence: Intertextuality with D&C 29

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

The Peter and Mary Whitmer home, where D&C 29 was presented at a Church conference. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org.

Abstract

D&C 29 holds a complex set of textual relationships with the Book of Moses, portions of which were translated both before and after D&C 29 was revealed.

Joseph Smith translated the Book of Moses intermittently between June 1830 and February 1831. During this same period, he also received several revelations now included in the Doctrine and Covenants. Among these, D&C 29 is especially significant because of its unusually dense concentration of parallels with the Book of Moses. To evaluate these connections, this study classifies each parallel into one of three categories:

  • Exclusive Parallels: parallels that do not appear anywhere else in scripture.
  • Nearly Exclusive Parallels: parallels that appear in only one or two additional scriptural passages.
  • Basic Parallels: parallels that appear in three or more additional scriptural passages. 

It must be clarified, however, that what counts as a single “parallel” in this study is typically made up of multiple textual elements, such as similar concepts, shared themes, or verbatim words and phrases.1 In the sections that follow, examples from each of these categories of parallels will be presented. Afterward, the significance of the combined intertextual relationships will be collectively evaluated.2 

Exclusive Textual Parallels

A simple example of an exclusive parallel can be seen in Moses 1:38 and D&C 29:33, where the phrases “no end” and “my works” show up next to one another in the same sentence, both in reference to God’s creations. Although other scriptures may discuss the endless or expansive nature of God’s works, no other passages contain both of these phrases together.

Book of Moses

D&C 29

1:38 and there is no end to my works, neither to my words.

33 but unto myself my works have no end, neither beginning; but it is given unto you that ye may understand, because ye have asked it of me and are agreed.

A more complicated exclusive parallel arises in Moses 5:9–15 and D&C 29:43–44. This parallel is comprised of a unique cluster of various elements. Particularly significant is the idea that those who “believe” and “repent” will receive “eternal life,” while those who “believe not” and “repent not” are “damned.” The passages also feature the concepts of being “redeemed” from a spiritual “fall.” Finally, the distinctive phrase “even as many as would/will” is used in both texts. 

Book of Moses

D&C 29

5:9 as thou hast fallen thou mayest be redeemed, and all mankind, even as many as will.

5:11 And Eve, his wife, heard all these things and was glad, saying: Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known … eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient.

5:15 And as many as believed in the Son, and repented of their sins, should be saved; and as many as believed not and repented not, should be damned

43 And thus did I, the Lord God, appoint unto man the days of his probation—that by his natural death he might be raised in immortality unto eternal life, even as many as would believe;

44 And they that believe not unto eternal damnation; for they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall, because they repent not;

Another complex exclusive parallel can be found in Moses 4:1–3 and D&C 29:36–37, which describe the story of Satan’s rebellion and subsequent fall from heaven. Not only do these passages share distinctive verbatim phrases such as “give me thine honor” and “rebelled against me” but they also have a generally similar sequence of elements.3

Book of Moses

D&C 29

4:1 That Satan … came before me, saying—Behold, here am I, send me, I will be thy son, and I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honor.

4:3 Wherefore, because that Satan rebelled against me, and sought to destroy the agency of man, which I, the Lord God, had given him, and also, that I should give unto him mine own power; by the power of mine Only Begotten, I caused that he should be cast down;

4:4 And he became Satan, yea, even the devil,

36 for, behold, the devil was before Adam, for he rebelled against me, saying, Give me thine honor, which is my power; and also a third part of the hosts of heaven turned he away from me because of their agency;

37 And they were thrust down, and thus came the devil and his angels;

A final example of an impressive exclusive parallel arises between Moses 6:55–56 and D&C 29:39. Both texts speak of experiencing that which is “bitter” in order to “know” that which is good or sweet.4 They also each feature the distinctive phrase “agents unto themselves.”

6:55 And the Lord spake unto Adam, saying: Inasmuch as thy children are conceived in sin, even so when they begin to grow up, sin conceiveth in their hearts, and they taste the bitter, that they may know to prize the good.

6:56 And it is given unto them to know good from evil; wherefore they are agents unto themselves

39 And it must needs be that the devil should tempt the children of men, or they could not be agents unto themselves; for if they never should have bitter they could not know the sweet

To be sure, some of the constituent elements identified in these parallels can be found outside of D&C 29 and the Book of Moses. It may even be that multiple elements from these parallels arise together outside of these two texts. However, exclusivity is not established by the uniqueness of any specific element or partial set of elements in any identified parallel but rather by the uniqueness of its entire set of elements.5

Nearly Exclusive Textual Parallels

As mentioned previously, textual parallels between the Book of Moses and D&C 29 that have just one or two attestations in other scriptural texts have been labeled in this study as “nearly exclusive.” A good example of this type of parallel arises between Moses 6:54 and D&C 29:46. Each text speaks of children being redeemed or whole “from the foundation of the world” through the power of Christ. The only other location where a similar cluster arises is Moroni 8:12. 

Book of Moses

D&C 29

Moroni 8

6:54 Hence came the saying abroad among the people, that the Son of God hath atoned for original guilt, wherein the sins of the parents cannot be answered upon the heads of the children, for they are whole from the foundation of the world.

46 But behold, I say unto you, that little children are redeemed from the foundation of the world through mine Only Begotten;

12 But little children are alive in Christ, even from the foundation of the world; if not so, God is a partial God, and also a changeable God, and a respecter to persons; for how many little children have died without baptism!

Another interesting example is the joint use of “carnal” and “sensual” in two locations from the Book of Moses (5:13 and 6:49) and also in D&C 29:35. However, Mosiah 16:3 and Alma 42:10 also feature these elements (as well as the term “devilish” which arises in the Book of Moses passages). 

Book of Moses

D&C 29

Book of Mormon

5:13 And Satan came among them, saying: I am also a son of God; and he commanded them, saying: Believe it not; and they believed it not, and they loved Satan more than God. And men began from that time forth to be carnal, sensual, and devilish.

6:49 Behold Satan hath come among the children of men, and tempteth them to worship him; and men have become carnal, sensual, and devilish, and are shut out from the presence of God.

35 and I gave unto him commandment, but no temporal commandment gave I unto him, for my commandments are spiritual; they are not natural nor temporal, neither carnal nor sensual.

Mosiah 16:3 For they are carnal and devilish, and the devil has power over them; yea, even that old serpent that did beguile our first parents, which was the cause of their fall; which was the cause of all mankind becoming carnal, sensual, devilish, knowing evil from good, subjecting themselves to the devil.

Alma 42:10 Therefore, as they had become carnal, sensual, and devilish, by nature, this probationary state became a state for them to prepare; it became a preparatory state.

A final example of near exclusivity arises between Moses 7:56–57 and D&C 29:12, which feature the elements of “crowns,” “right hand,” and “glory” in an eschatological context. The only other place where these three elements arise together is D&C 104:7.

Book of Moses

D&C 29

D&C 104

7:56 And he heard a loud voice; and the heavens were veiled; and all the creations of God mourned; and the earth groaned; and the rocks were rent; and the saints arose, and were crowned at the right hand of the Son of Man, with crowns of glory;

7:57 And as many of the spirits as were in prison came forth, and stood on the right hand of God;

12 mine apostles, the Twelve which were with me in my ministry at Jerusalem, shall stand at my right hand at the day of my coming in a pillar of fire, being clothed with robes of righteousness, with crowns upon their heads, in glory even as I am, to judge the whole house of Israel

7 And all this that the innocent among you may not be condemned with the unjust; and that the guilty among you may not escape; because I, the Lord, have promised unto you a crown of glory at my right hand.

Before moving on to the next category of parallels, it should be pointed out that several studies have suggested the authors of the Book of Mormon very likely had access to a text that was much like the Book of Moses (presumably recorded on the Brass Plates). This conclusion arises from the extent to which the Book of Mormon implements distinctive words, phrases, and concepts from the Book of Moses, often in contexts that point to a pre-flood setting.6 Thus, in situations where the only other attestations of certain parallels arise in the Book of Mormon, it seems likely that they—much like D&C 29—are interacting with the same core material or tradition that was originally preserved in the Book of Moses. The same could also be true when similar material arises in the Bible or other D&C revelations, but the direction of influence may be somewhat more difficult to trace in such circumstances.7

Basic Textual Parallels

The parallels that fall under the “basic” category are not as exclusive to the Book of Moses and D&C 29. They should therefore be viewed more cautiously. Even so, they remain valid and relevant, especially when they appear in close proximity to stronger parallels or participate in the same larger doctrinal pattern.

One example is the phrase “whatsoever ye shall ask” followed by the idea of a blessing being given or received, as seen in Moses 6:52 and D&C 29:6. Although somewhat distinctive, a similar pairing of elements arises in a wide variety of other scriptural passages (see Matthew 21:22; John 11:22; 15:16; 16:23; 1 John 3:22; Enos 1:15; Mosiah 4:21; 3 Nephi 18:20; 27:28; Moroni 7:26; D&C 50:30; 88:64; 101:27; 132:40).8

Book of Moses

D&C 29

6:52 ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, asking all things in his name, and whatsoever ye shall ask, it shall be given you.

6 And, as it is written—Whatsoever ye shall ask in faith, being united in prayer according to my command, ye shall receive.

Another example is found in the connection between Moses 7:61 and D&C 29:14, which each describe a significant future “day” in which the sun or heavens will be “darkened” in conjunction with other commotions in the heavens and the earth. Yet the total number of similar attestations in other texts is, once again, quite extensive (see Isaiah 13:10–13; Joel 2:10; Matthew 24:29; Mark 13:24–25; Luke 21:25–26; Acts 2:19–20; Revelation 6:12–14; D&C 34:9; 45:42; 88:87; 133:49).

Book of Moses

D&C 29

7:61 before that day the heavens shall be darkened, and a veil of darkness shall cover the earth; and the heavens shall shake, and also the earth;

14 before this great day shall come the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall be turned into blood, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and there shall be greater signs in heaven above and in the earth beneath;

Other parallels that fall under the “basic” category aren’t as widespread. This can be seen in the use of the term “natural/naturally” in connection to discernment (whether seeing or understanding) in Moses 1:11 and D&C 29:33. In this case, a similar pairing of concepts can only be located in six other locations throughout scripture (see 1 Corinthians 2:14; 2 Peter 2:12; Jude 1:10; Alma 26:21; D&C 58:3; 67:10–12), making this a more meaningful match.

Book of Moses

D&C 29

1:11 But now mine own eyes have beheld God; but not my natural, but my spiritual eyes, for my natural eyes could not have beheld;

33 Speaking unto you that you may naturally understand;

Analysis of Collective Intertextual Parallels

In total, this study has identified just over two dozen textual parallels between the Book of Moses and D&C 29. As previously mentioned and as depicted in the examples above, most of these single parallels are actually comprised of clusters of related elements (synonymous concepts, shared themes, verbatim or nearly verbatim words and phrases, etc.).9 Thus, if one were to include each individual element in the analysis, the total count would involve many dozens of parallels (see Appendix 1). The following chart, while it still combines some elements together, provides a striking illustration of how thoroughly saturated D&C 29 is with Book of Moses material.10

Intertextuality with D&C 29 (Chart 2).jpg.png

As explained in previous sections, not all of these parallels are equally compelling. Especially when viewed in isolation, any parallels designated under the “basic” category should naturally be seen as less significant than those which are “exclusive” or “nearly exclusive” to the Book of Moses and D&C 29. That being said, it must be understood that the “basic” parallels make up just less than one third of the total number of all identified parallels, which means that a two-thirds majority involve either “exclusive” or “nearly exclusive” relationships (see Appendix 2).

Another important factor has to do with clustering, not just the clustering of elements that might make up a single parallel but the fact that many clusters of parallels themselves show up in close proximity to one another throughout D&C 29 and the Book of Moses. These concentrations of elements—what could be termed “clusters of clusters”—can be readily observed in the chart above.

When analyzing these larger macro clusters, it should be recognized that “basic” parallels often turn up alongside “exclusive” and “nearly exclusive” parallels (see Appendix 3). This has a mutually strengthening outcome on all of the identified parallels no matter their independent strength, since concentrations of shared elements are far less likely to collectively arise together by chance. Thus, when viewed in context, even most of the “basic” parallels seem very likely to hold intentional correlations with the Book of Moses.

Translation Sequence

The historical record suggests that Moses 1–3 was revealed to Joseph Smith between June and September 1830. It seems likely that Moses 4 and portions of Moses 5 were then received sometime throughout September and October. After that, the rest of Moses 5 and Moses 6–8 were received between October 1830 and February 1831. Importantly, the historical evidence indicates that D&C 29 was dictated either close to or at a Church conference held on September 26–28 of 1830, placing the reception of D&C 29 right near the middle of the Book of Moses translation sequence.11

Situating D&C 29 in this context may help explain why it is so thoroughly infused with Book of Moses content. One intriguing interpretation, as has been put forward by scholars such as Robert Matthews and Kerry Muhlestein, is that the Lord was building upon and re-articulating ancient truths that had just recently been restored in Moses 1–5.12 What seems to have gone largely unnoticed, however, is the extent to which D&C 29 also interacts with Moses 6–7, chapters that hadn’t even been translated yet. In other words, D&C 29 not only points backwards to material that had just been revealed (Moses 1–5) but also forward to material that was about to be revealed (Moses 5–7). In this regard, it reflects the type of temporally complex dictation sequencing that attends many textual units throughout the Book of Mormon.13

The Mode of Revelation

In connection with the September 1830 setting, the official history of the Church introduces D&C 29 as a “Revelation given in the presence of six elders,”14 a detail broadly consistent with John Whitmer’s earlier heading to the Revelation Book 1 copy of the revelation, which describes it as “A Revelation to Six Elders of the Church & three members.”15 This seems to indicate that the revelation was received in a public setting with multiple witnesses.16

Conclusion

Overall, the Book of Moses and D&C 29 come across as a believable and related set of genuine revelations. While the Book of Moses provides the ancient historical background and origin story for a number of crucial doctrines and teachings, D&C 29 summarizes and synthesizes much of that material, repackaging it into a cohesive and independent revelation for modern audiences that has its own unique rhetorical structure and original content.17

If approached from a strictly naturalistic worldview, some of the shared language could be attributed to the Bible, to Joseph Smith’s developing revelatory vocabulary, or to the possibility that later portions of the Book of Moses were shaped by themes already present in D&C 29. Such a simple and straightforward explanation, however, may not be fully satisfying.

Imagine, for instance, if Smith were a fraud and had merely made up the contents of the Book of Moses and D&C 29. Producing such an impressive array of parallels would have been no easy task, especially when considering that these revelations were dictated in the presence of a scribe or multiple witnesses and most likely were delivered in a single take with relatively few substantive revisions.18 Not only would Smith need to recall from memory many specific words and phrases from Moses 1–5 when dictating D&C 29, but he would also need to implement many details from Moses 6–7, even though those chapters hadn’t even been translated yet and were presumably only in his imagination at the time. Moreover, at a later date, he would then need to remember to appropriately disperse that synthesized data throughout Moses 6–7.

While such remarkable intertextual control may not be technically impossible for a human mind to produce, it is likely beyond what many authors—perhaps the vast majority—could accomplish using their own intellect, especially in the types of constraining dictation settings in which Smith typically produced his revelations. The fact that researchers today, who have access to modern computers with search engines, are still struggling to fully unpack these intricate textual relationships is telling.

Ultimately, how Smith was able to introduce, remember, synthesize, and redistribute these clusters of elements across multiple dictated texts remains to be explained by theories that don’t appeal to divine revelation. These textual parallels therefore provide a valuable line of evidence supporting Joseph Smith’s prophetic calling and the miraculous nature of his dictated revelations, both ancient and modern.  

Further Reading
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Relevant Scriptures
Endnotes
Intertextuality
Doctrine and Covenants
Book of Moses