Evidence #451 | June 18, 2024

Book of Mormon Evidence: Limhi's Historical Summary

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

Abstract

Limhi’s speech, recorded in Mosiah 7, has numerous textual parallels with content found throughout Mormon’s abridgment in Mosiah 9–24.

Sometimes, the Book of Mormon presents the same historical content from different perspectives, allowing the reader to test the consistency of each account’s respective details. One fascinating example can be seen in Limhi’s speech delivered in Mosiah 7:18–33

In numerous ways, Limhi’s statements correlate with content that the reader will later encounter in Mormon’s abridgment spanning Mosiah 9–24. In particular, Limhi appears to have drawn upon the recorded words of his grandfather Zeniff and also details from Abinadi’s ministry, which may have been preserved in his people’s royal records. The way Mormon’s own historical statements are consistent with Limhi’s earlier speech adds another layer of editorial complexity and realism.1 In the sections below, intertextual relationships among these sources will be selectively highlighted.

Parallels with Zeniff’s Account

Over-Zealous

Limhi described Zeniff as being “over-zealous to inherit the land of his fathers,” (Mosiah 7:21). Zeniff himself similarly declared, “I being over-zealous to inherit the land of our fathers, collected as many as were desirous to go up to possess the land, and started again on our journey” (Mosiah 9:3). These are the only two locations in the Book of Mormon that feature the term “over-zealous.” In each instance, it is used as part of a nearly identical eight-word phrase describing the same person. 

Cunning, Craftiness, and Deception

Limhi reported that Zeniff had been “deceived by the cunning and craftiness of king Laman” (Mosiah 7:21). A closely matching phrase can be found in Zeniff’s own account: “Now it was the cunning and the craftiness of king Laman, to bring my people into bondage” (Mosiah 9:10). In the next chapter, Zeniff invoked a similar description: “For this very cause has king Laman, by his cunning, and lying craftiness, and his fair promises, deceived me” (Mosiah 10:18). Throughout the Book of Mormon, the terms “cunning” and “craftiness” only show up in close proximity in these two textual units.2 

Land Treaty

Limhi stated that the Lamanite king “entered into a treaty with king Zeniff” which required the Nephites to yield up “the possessions of a part of the land, or even the city of Lehi-Nephi, and the city of Shilom” (Mosiah 7:21). Likewise, Zeniff recorded that he wanted to enter into a “treaty” with the Lamanites (Mosiah 9:2) and that eventually the Lamanite king “covenanted with me that I might possess the land of Lehi-Nephi, and the land of Shilom” (Mosiah 9:6). Thus, we have a very specific geographic detail in each account given in the context of a treaty between the same two parties. 

Parallels with Abinadi’s Ministry and Prophecies

Iniquities, Abominations, and Bondage

Limhi explained to his people that the reason the Lord “brought us into bondage” was due to “iniquities and abominations” (Mosiah 7:20). This corresponds with the following prophecy given by Abinadi: “I will visit them in my anger, yea, in my fierce anger will I visit them in their iniquities and abominations. … Thus saith the Lord, it shall come to pass that this generation, because of their iniquities, shall be brought into bondage” (Mosiah 12:1–2). This cluster of concepts is unique to these two locations in the Book of Mormon.3 

God among Men

The prophet which Limhi described as preaching among his people made several statements about the condescension of Christ. These teachings correspond very well with Abinadi’s statements on the same topic, as found in Mormon’s later abridgment:

Limhi’s Speech (Mosiah 7)

Abinadi’s Prophecies (Mosiah 13)

27 And because he said unto them that Christ was the God, the Father of all things, and said that he should take upon him the image of man, … and that God should come down among the children of men, and take upon him flesh and blood, and go forth upon the face of the earth

34 Have they not said that God himself should come down among the children of men, and take upon him the form of man, and go forth in mighty power upon the face of the earth?

As might be expected, these are the only locations in the Book of Mormon where this cluster of very similar phrases show up together. 

Smitten with Sore Afflictions

After recounting how his people had slain a prophet, Limhi declared concerning them, “Therefore, who wondereth that they are in bondage, and that they are smitten with sore afflictions?” (Mosiah 7:28). A similar statement comes from Zeniff’s account: “but we were smitten with famine and sore afflictions; for we were slow to remember the Lord our God” (Mosiah 9:3). Even more relevant, however, is a prophecy that the Lord delivered through Abinadi: “And it shall come to pass that I will smite this my people with sore afflictions” (Mosiah 12:4). Thus, Limhi would have had two precedents from which he could have derived this phrase. Notably, a form of the word “smite” only shows up in close proximity with the phrase “sore afflictions” on one other occasion in the text, making this a nearly exclusive match.4 

East Wind

The prophet that came among Limhi’s people stated, “If my people shall sow filthiness they shall reap the east wind, which bringeth immediate destruction” (Mosiah 7:31). The only other location where the phrase “east wind” is found in the Book of Mormon happens to come from one of Abinadi’s prophecies in Mormon’s later abridgment: “And it shall come to pass that I will send forth hail among them, and it shall smite them; and they shall also be smitten with the east wind” (Mosiah 12:6). 

Parallels with Mormon’s Commentary

Putting Trust in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob

Limhi encouraged his people to “put your trust in God, in that God who was the God of Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob” (Mosiah 7:19). When Mormon later recounted the deliverance story of Alma and his people, he made some theological points that appear to draw on this portion of Limhi’s prior message. These are the only places in the Book of Mormon where these concepts all turn up together in close proximity:5 

Limhi’s Speech (Mosiah 7)

Mormon’s Abridgment (Mosiah 23)

19 Therefore, lift up your heads, and rejoice, and put your trust in God, in that God who was the God of Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob

20 And again, that same God has brought our fathers out of the land of Jerusalem, and has kept and preserved his people even until now; and behold, it is because of our iniquities and abominations that he has brought us into bondage.

22 Nevertheless—whosoever putteth his trust in him the same shall be lifted up at the last day. Yea, and thus it was with this people.

23 For behold, I will show unto you that they were brought into bondage, and none could deliver them but the Lord their God, yea, even the God of Abraham and Isaac and of Jacob.

24 And it came to pass that he did deliver them, and he did show forth his mighty power unto them, and great were their rejoicings.

Tribute

In his royal speech, Limhi stated, “And behold, we at this time do pay tribute to the king of the Lamanites” (Mosiah 7:22). Later in his abridgment, Mormon similarly remarked that the Nephites “pay tribute to the king of the Lamanites from year to year” (Mosiah 19:15). As for the specific amount, Limhi declared that “even one half of all we have or possess the king of the Lamanites doth exact of us” (Mosiah 7:22). Likewise, Mormon stated that the Lamanites allowed the Nephites to keep their lands on the condition that they “deliver up their property, even one half of all they possessed” (Mosiah 19:15). Notice that these textual consistencies involve nearly verbatim matches of two fairly lengthy phrases. 

Great Mourning for Slain

In his speech, Limhi twice emphasized the extent of his people’s mourning and their cause to mourn: “Now behold, how great reason we have to mourn. Yea, I say unto you, great are the reasons which we have to mourn; for behold how many of our brethren have been slain” (Mosiah 7:23–24). When Mormon’s historical flashback nearly catches back up to Limhi’s people in their current state, he emphasized similar points: “And it came to pass that the Lamanites did beat them, and drove them back, and slew many of them. And now there was a great mourning and lamentation among the people of Limhi, the widow mourning for her husband, the son and the daughter mourning for their father, and the brothers for their brethren” (Mosiah 21:8–9). 

Conclusion

In point after point, Limhi’s summary of his people’s history is consistent with Mormon’s later abridgment of that same history, which includes the account of Zeniff, the ministry of Abinadi, and Mormon’s own commentary. Parallels include doctrinal themes, narrative content, prophetic fulfillments, and more. In a number of instances, unique details, lengthy phrasal matches, or clusters of related elements help solidify proposed intertextual relationships. For a comprehensive chart of these consistencies, including many that weren’t included in the body of this article, see the Appendix. 

Limhi's Historical Summary (Chart).jpg

If the text’s own claims are to be believed, these relationships can be reasonably accounted for. As Zeniff’s grandson and royal heir, Limhi would surely have had access to his grandfather’s first-person account and would likely have been quite familiar with it. The fact that this same account was later read publicly by King Mosiah helps establish its significance among the Nephite people (Mosiah 25:5), thus providing incentive for Mormon to utilize it in his abridgment. 

Because many of Abinadi’s statements were given in public or legal contexts, it is plausible that they would have ended up as part of a royal or judicial record. As the son of the king, Limhi may even have been an eyewitness at Abinadi’s trial, much like Alma who also made a record of Abinadi’s teachings (Mosiah 17:4). Although we can’t be sure exactly how Mormon created his final abridgment of Abinadi’s ministry and trial, there is reason to believe that Mormon and Limhi would have had access to some of the same sources.6 

Finally, as the last editor (and possibly redactor) of this book, it makes sense that Mormon’s own summary of historical details would be regularly consistent with the source texts that he himself had read and copied into his abridgment. We should also keep in mind that Mormon was apparently quite selective in his use of sources. Concerning Limhi’s speech, Mormon wrote that Limhi “spake many things unto them and only a few of them have I written in this book” (Mosiah 8:1; emphasis added). It therefore isn’t a stretch to assume that Mormon was carefully choosing material from Limhi’s royal address that dovetailed with the contents and themes that Mormon had planned to include throughout the rest of his abridgment. 

In contrast, if Joseph Smith simply fabricated the contents of the Book of Mormon, then the burden of these many textual consistencies would fall squarely on his creative imagination and mental recall. This feat would be particularly notable because, according to witnesses, the poorly educated Smith rapidly dictated the Book of Mormon without relying on any notes or manuscripts.7 

Even if he had mentally outlined the general contours of these stories before their dictation, as some have supposed, it is hard to imagine him compacting so many details into Limhi’s speech which he would later remember to disperse throughout Mormon’s abridgment. These types of subtle textual consistencies, prevalent in so many locations throughout the Book of Mormon, help support the claim that it was dictated by the gift and power of God.8 

Further Reading
Appendix
Endnotes