Evidence #198 | May 28, 2021

Book of Mormon Evidence: Talionic Justice

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

Abstract

Consistent with ancient Israelite law and culture, the Book of Mormon expresses the talionic principle of justice in a variety of ways, both overt and subtle, poetic and straightforward.

Talionic Justice in the Bible

According to legal scholar John W. Welch, “it is fair to say that no principle is more fundamental to the concept of justice in biblical times than the requirement that the punishment should somehow match, relate to, or balance out the nature of the crime or wrongdoing itself.”1 This legal concept, known as talionic justice, was prevalent in all ancient Near Eastern legal systems.2 As further articulated by Welch, “Talionic justice achieved a sense of poetic justice, rectification of imbalance, relatedness between the nature of the wrong and the fashioning of the remedy, and appropriateness in determining the measure or degree of punishment.”3

One famous talionic expression in the Bible can be seen in Leviticus 24:17–21, which uses a literary form called chiasmus to emphasize justice’s reciprocal nature:4

A

And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death.

 

B

And he that killeth a beast shall make it good; beast for beast.

 

 

C

And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done,

so shall it be done to him;

 

 

 

D

Breach for breach,

eye for eye,

tooth for tooth:

 

 

C

as he hath caused a blemish in a man,

so shall it be done to him again.

 

B

And he that killeth a beast, he shall restore it:

A

and he that killeth a man, he shall be put to death.

In biblical law, justice was implemented through human or divine administration in three areas or spheres: social, judicial, and religious. While talionic justice was certainly an important guiding principle, it is important to recognize that not all legal, judicial, or divine decrees implemented it, simply because in many cases it was beyond human capability to accomplish. Moreover, God’s justice is also not strictly “eye for eye,” for He allows for mercy in many cases, usually in the form of giving people more time to correct past errors. Nevertheless, variations of the talionic principle are pervasive in biblical expressions, narratives, and legal situations.

Gehazi. Image via jw.org. 

In some instances, punishments were indeed identical to the offense itself. For example, when Judah and Simeon caught a Canaanite king named Adoni-bezek, they “cut off his thumbs and his great toes” because he had previously done the same thing to 70 kings (Judges 1:6–7). In other circumstances, punishments were closely related to the crime (or intended crime) but were not exactly similar. This can be seen in the case of Gehazi, who greedily accepted a monetary reward for the healing of Naaman’s leprosy, for which Gehazi was struck with leprosy himself (2 Kings 5:27).5

In Mosaic Law, talionic justice was mandated for certain crimes (murder, bearing false witness and bodily injury), but God more often took matters into His own hands (as in the case of Gehazi) to mete out just punishments. “Thus, while talionic formulas are found mostly in cases of divine justice in the biblical period,” noted Welch, “the talionic principle guided judges in certain cases as well. The same was the case in Book of Mormon law and society.”6

Talionic Justice in the Book of Mormon

Book of Mormon prophets expressed the talionic principle on many occasions and in a variety of ways. Some of their statements allude to biblical passages. In an epistle to Ammoron, Moroni wrote, “I will follow you even into your own land, which is the land of our first inheritance; yea, and it shall be blood for blood, yea, life for life” (Alma 54:12). This seems to echo the talionic formula found in Exodus 21:23–25: “thou shalt give life for life.”

Other talionic expressions in the Book of Mormon are quite original, as can be seen in Alma’s chiastic message about the resurrection:

A

the meaning of the word restoration

 

B

is to bring back again evil for evil, or carnal for carnal, or devilish for devilish—

 

 

C

a

good for that which is good;

 

 

 

 

b

righteous for that which is righteous;

 

 

 

 

 

c

just for that which is just;

 

 

 

 

 

 

d

merciful for that which is merciful.

 

 

C

 

 

 

d

Therefore, my son, see that you are merciful unto your brethren;

 

 

 

 

 

c

deal justly,

 

 

 

 

b

judge righteously,

 

 

 

a

and do good continually; and if ye do all these things then shall ye receive your reward;

 

 

C

 

 

 

d

yea, ye shall have mercy restored unto you again;

 

 

 

 

 

c

ye shall have justice restored unto you again; 

 

 

 

 

b

ye shall have a righteous judgment restored unto you again;

 

 

 

a

and ye shall have good rewarded unto you again.

 

B

For that which ye do send out shall return unto you again, and be restored; 

A

therefore, the word restoration more fully condemneth the sinner, and justifieth him not at all. (Alma 41:13–15)

Much like the chiasm in Leviticus 24:17–21, Alma’s statements poetically emphasize the reciprocal nature of justice, whether that be for good or ill. As explained by Welch, “There is no better illustration in the Book of Mormon of a prophet’s explanation of the literal talionic nature of God’s justice than Alma’s admonition to his son Corianton in Alma 41:13–15.”7

Corianton listening. Image via churchofjesuschrist.org. 

In addition to doctrinal statements, a number of Book of Mormon narratives, especially those involving legal cases, offer poignant examples of talionic justice. For instance, Korihor was an outspoken critic of Christ’s church who, through his words, actively sought to lead people away from the truth. For these crimes, and for seeking a sign, “Korihor was struck dumb, that he could not have utterance, according to the words of Alma” (Alma 30:50). Welch explained, “Korihor’s … curse befits his crime. Because he had spoken evil, he was punished by being made unable to speak.”8

This isn’t the only talionic element of the story, though. During his trial, Korihor was adamant that Alma and the leaders of Christ’s church were “glutting” themselves upon the labors of the poor (Alma 30:27, 31). Yet after he was cursed, it was Korihor who ended up going “about from house to house, begging food for his support” (vv. 56, 58).

In addition, Korihor repeatedly accused leaders of Christ’s church of bringing people “down” under various types of unnecessary bondage that had been handed “down” to them through their religious traditions:

  • “O ye that are bound down under a foolish and a vain hope” (Alma 30:13)
  • “Behold, these things which ye call prophecies, which ye say are handed down by holy prophets, behold, they are foolish traditions of your fathers” (v. 14)
  • “I do not teach this people to bind themselves down under the foolish ordinances and performances which are laid down by ancient priests, to usurp power and authority over them, to keep them in ignorance, that they may not lift up their heads, but be brought down according to thy words” (v. 23)
  • “and ye keep them down, even as it were in bondage, that ye may glut yourselves with the labors of their hands” (v. 27)

In contrast, Alma claimed that it was Korihor who, if left unchecked, would bring “many souls down to destruction” (Alma 30:47). It seems fitting that after falsely accusing others of bringing the people down into bondage and of passing down oppressive religious traditions, while he himself was leading the people down into spiritual destruction, Korihor ended up being trodden down by the wicked Zoramites: “and as he went forth amongst them, behold, he was run upon and trodden down, even until he was dead” (v. 59). The irony of this situation doesn’t seem to have been lost on Mormon, who immediately remarked: “and thus we see that the devil will not support his children at the last day, but doth speedily drag them down to hell” (v. 60).

Image from “All Things Denote There Is a God” via Gospel Media Library, online at churchofjesuschrist.org. 

Unlike overt doctrinal statements, talionic elements are not always readily apparent in Book of Mormon narratives. Sometimes, only careful attention to detail, aided by an awareness of ancient legal customs, reveals them for what they are. In this instance, multiple lines of evidence converge to solidify the talionic nature of Korihor’s fate. Other narratives, such as Alma and Amulek’s ministry at Ammonihah and Teancum’s assassination of Amalickiah, are buttressed by similar sets of converging data. For a lengthy list of talionic passages in the Book of Mormon, accompanied by commentary and explanation, see the Appendix.

Conclusion

“In summary,” concluded Welch, “the talionic principle—that one will or should be treated as he treats others—is applied in the Book of Mormon in the same pattern as in ancient Israel.”9 In some instances, Book of Mormon expressions of justice clearly interact with or draw upon those found in the Bible, but even then, the specific phrasing and structure is often distinctive. This is especially so in narratives (particularly legal cases) where the talionic principle is subtly conveyed by the outcomes of events, rather than through formal expressions.

The pervasive presence of talionic justice in the Book of Mormon may be best explained as coming from authors who were intimately familiar with its usage in the Bible, whose culture implemented and emphasized the principle on a regular basis, and who had the literary training and skills to articulate it in a variety of ways, both overt and subtle, poetic and straightforward. These criteria are consistent with the Book of Mormon’s own claims about its authorship.

Further Reading
Relevant Scriptures
Appendix
Endnotes
Law
Book of Mormon

© 2024 Scripture Central: A Non-Profit Organization. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-5294264