Evidence #239 | September 20, 2021

Book of Mormon Evidence: Sequentially Consistent Chronology

Post contributed by

 

Scripture Central

Abstract

The Book of Mormon collectively features hundreds of references to time. These references are sequentially consistent, even when separated by large amounts of text.

Sequentially Significant Chronology

The Book of Mormon contains multiple calendar systems which collectively feature at least 280 sequentially significant references to time.1 This chronological data is remarkably consistent for all calendars, even when related time references are separated by large amounts of text.

Generally Consistent Correlations

In many instances, more than one year passes between time references. For example, Mormon 4:16 reports that a military conflict took place in “the three hundred and seventy and fifth year.” Then, in the next chapter, Mormon noted that “three hundred and seventy and nine years passed away” (Mormon 5:5). Although these dates are separated by approximately 5 years, they are generally consistent in the sense that the second reference is chronologically later than the first reference.

It would seem to have been an error, for example, if Mormon mentioned the 375th year in Mormon 4:16 and then, after recording intervening events, reported that a lesser number of years, say 370 years, had passed away in Mormon 5:5. Chronological errors of this nature don’t appear to be present in the text.2 The only time the reported chronology backtracks is in the case of clearly established flashbacks,3 in which case it would be erroneous if the time did not back up with the shift in narrative.4

Precisely Consistent Correlations

While the hundreds of sequentially significant references to time in the text all seem to be technically consistent, some of them correlate more precisely than others. As defined in this evidence summary, a precisely consistent correlation occurs whenever a currently reported year immediately follows the previously mentioned year, or when the current year is the same as the previous year.5 For instance, Alma 63:1–10 features seven dates, each of which is sequentially consistent and correlates precisely with the immediately preceding date:

Chronology

Verse

Text

36th year

(start)

Alma 63:1

And it came to pass in the commencement of the thirty and sixth year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi, that Shiblon took possession of those sacred things …

36th year

(ended)

Alma 63:3

And it came to pass that Moroni died also. And thus ended the thirty and sixth year of the reign of the judges.

37th year

Alma 63:4

And it came to pass that in the thirty and seventh year of the reign of the judges, there was a large company of men … departed out of the land of Zarahemla …

37th year

(ended)

Alma 63:6

… and they took their course northward. And thus ended the thirty and seventh year.

38th year

Alma 63:7

And in the thirty and eighth year, this man built other ships.

38th year

(ended)

Alma 63:9

And it came to pass that in this year there were many people who went forth into the land northward. And thus ended the thirty and eighth year.

39th year

Alma 63:10

And it came to pass in the thirty and ninth year of the reign of the judges, Shiblon died also, and Corianton had gone forth to the land northward in a ship, …

Textually Distant Correlations

According to those who witnessed the translation of the Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith didn’t make use of any notes or reference materials when he dictated the text to his scribes.6 In addition, the extant portions of the original manuscript show no signs of any substantive content revisions.7 This means that if Joseph had simply fabricated the Book of Mormon, he would have needed to rely solely on his memory to keep track of its many details, including its chronological data. It also means there would have been little to no room for error. The text he dictated to his scribes was essentially a final draft.

With this in mind, it is notable that many of the Book of Mormon’s corresponding time references are separated by substantial amounts of text. In a few cases, multiple chapters (involving thousands of words) separate precisely related dates. For instance, before narrating a lengthy flashback involving the missionary experiences of the sons of Mosiah, Mormon reported: “thus ended the fourteenth year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi” (Alma 16:21). Then, twelve chapters later (comprising nearly 16,000 words), Mormon concluded the flashback and marked the end of the very next year: “thus endeth the fifteenth year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi” (Alma 28:7).

Another case of exceptional textual distance between time markers can be found before and after the coming of Christ. Before reporting Christ’s arrival at the temple in Bounitful, Mormon gave a preview of what would follow, noting that “in the ending of the thirty and fourth year, behold, I will show unto you that the people of Nephi who were spared” (3 Nephi 10:18). After spending 21 chapters (again, comprising nearly 16,000 words) giving the details of Christ’s ministry, Mormon then picked back up where he had left off, reporting in 4 Nephi 1:1 that “the thirty and fourth year passed away.”

While most year markers are not so textually distant, many of them are still separated by a significant amount of text. There are 109 instances of a year marker being 150 words or more from a previous marker. In 85 of these 109 instances, the current marker correlates precisely with the previous one. In addition, there are 66 instances of a year marker being 400 words or more from the previous marker. In 56 of these 66 instances, the current maker correlates precisely with the previous one. These calculations are derived from a chart provided in the Appendix.

The Translation Process

To help put this data into perspective, readers should be aware that according to the witnesses of the translation, Joseph Smith would slowly read a line of text to his scribe (probably around 20 to 30 words at a time), giving the scribe time to write it down, after which the scribe would repeat it to him to verify its accuracy.8 Thus, the translation process would have been much more time-consuming than simply reading the text silently to oneself, as many readers encounter it today.

Based on his analysis of the translation timeline, as well as informal experiments aimed to replicate the Book of Mormon’s translation process, John W. Welch has proposed that, on average, Joseph Smith was likely dictating about 10–20 words per minute.9 At this rate, 150 words would have taken around 8 to 15 minutes to translate, and 400 words of text would have taken between 20 to 40 minutes to translate.

This means that in 84 instances, Joseph dictated a date that was precisely consistent with the previously given date, even though, on average, 7 or more minutes had likely elapsed during the dictation process. And in 55 instances, this same feat occurred, except that 20 or more minutes had likely passed. In some cases of exceptional textual distance, or when the translation was disrupted for other reasons, many hours or even days had surely passed between the dictation of precisely consistent dates.10

Diverse Textual Complexity

Finally, it should be remembered that chronology isn’t the only data-rich feature of the text. The scores of sequentially consistent dates in the Book of Mormon are woven in among numerous other details, including complex narratives, hundreds of named people and places, accounts of travel and migration, flashbacks, sermons, battles, fulfilled prophecies, editorial promises, and intertextual relationships.11 Despite such complexity, Emma Smith once remarked that when Joseph “stopped for any purpose at any time he would, when he commenced again, begin where he left off without any hesitation.”12

Conclusion

The essentially flawless—and in many cases precise—sequential consistency of the Book of Mormon’s chronological data provides a good example of its impressive complexity. This type of consistency would be difficult for most authors to achieve under normal circumstances, with access to notes and outlines and the ability to review previously written or dictated text. How Joseph Smith produced it—in essentially one take, without such aids, and with significant amounts of text (and therefore time spent in dictation) between time references—is a perplexing question for any theory that rejects the Book of Mormon’s miraculous origins.

In contrast, the text’s precise chronological data seem much more consistent with its own claimed origins. If the Book of Mormon really was primarily derived from various dated source texts, then it makes sense that Mormon would have repeatedly referenced those dates when making his abridgment. Instead of having to make the dates up as he went along and keep them all in his memory during a laborious and frequently-interrupted dictation process, Mormon would presumably have had the ability to simply transcribe those dates—for the most part already in sequential order—from underlying historical records, with minimal effort on his part to keep track of them all.

In summary, the Book of Mormon’s multiple and sometimes overlapping calendar systems, with their scores of sequentially consistent time references, place a significant burden on alterative theories about the text’s origins, while strengthening its claim of being a miraculously translated abridgment of authentic historical documents. 

Appendix
Further Reading
Endnotes
Complexity
Chronology
Sequential Consistency
Book of Mormon

© 2024 Scripture Central: A Non-Profit Organization. All rights reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-5294264